Quote:
Originally Posted by xdrcfrx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OP stated he sent this all to the GM's months ago. What other channels would be "proper" in your view, and had this been raised in those channels would your opinion change? This feels like a meaningless deflection. Why should "Riot's own former precedent" determine whether or not the GM's change the ruleset?
|
You propose changes in the UN, not by begging GMs to validate your baseless claims that Stunningly is cheating. Arcler's former behavior will mean any changes proposed will be turned down. You reap what you sow, oh well.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/a...1&d=1644341706
Precedent here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xdrcfrx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
More strawmanning and and personal attacks. You acknowledge above that cheating is possible, so what is the scam exactly? Why can't you just engage with this subject honestly? (that's a rhetorical question, I understand why you won't).
|
I have engaged in this honestly. You're lying yourself if you pretend that you haven't crossed any of the lines that you accuse me of crossing. The only difference is you don't see me crying about it. If it hurts your feelings to hear that somebody thinks you're crying, maybe you should consider not crying?