Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please read the example more carefully, because it is all you need to understand why OP's evidence is invalid. He doesn't have the ping for everybody in the video, so he has no idea how the data was received.
|
Via Hotkarlmarxbro above:
"The fastest racers of the pack (which vary from week to week, with the exception of stunningly and the race bloodeye scripted and submitted his petition) we can say naturally select for above average reaction time and a closer position to the server. So someone on the East coast with a 30 ping and 170ms reaction time will clock in at 200ms to the server. An observer with 50 ping will see the roll at 25ms and then the legit racer (or at least one that baked in a delay to the scripts) leaves the line at 225ms for a total of 200ms from roll to run."
In other words all these are within the distribution that we would expect from racers.
However since you were strictly looking at the reaction times of the accused I feel it's important to point out that we know with a great deal of certainty what their response time is. It's inhuman. Additional sources of delay from the accused make the real response times even less believable because we know when the server transmitted the +900 random and we know the observer and stunninglys ping and can calculate the window for which he got the packet and when her responded in relation to the observers recording.