Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No evidence given, and the logic here doesn't prove your point that Warriors are always better. You are basically just saying Warriors are better in specific end game scenarios, which everyone here agrees upon. You are throwing out a huge chunk of the game by dismissing leveling lol. And as for Monks, OP is asking about SK vs. Warrior. It doesn't sound like OP wants to roll Monk. Since he is in a static, SK works just fine for Fungi Tunic camp.
|
What kind of evidence would you like? shall I go record a pug with no tank? You are the one that keeps repeating wars are better end game, not me, but I agree. Leveling is almost the best place for a warrior to outperform an sk, especially in a trio. An ench/cleric/tank trio with the same players will level faster with a warrior over an sk or a monk if they are competent and they will have access to more difficult camps. No I will not parse or play 3 tanks to 60 one-thousand times each to supply you with evidence you moron. The reason monk is suggested for fungi is because at the end of the day sk is outperformed in every department that is not trivial, especially xping.