Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBellamy
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
https://www.science.org/content/arti...19-vaccination
https://vinayprasadmdmph.substack.co...tis-stratified
summary: If you are a male aged 12 to 30 and receive an mRNA vaccine, your chances of having myocarditis are roughly 1 in 3000 to 6000.
this isn't some antivax prop, it's science.org and the uk official data
would you advise your 18 year old son in the prime of his life and health to take a vaccine which has a 1 in 3-6000 chance of damaging his heart, perhaps permanently, to stave off a disease that for him personally presents very little risk?
should your son take one for the team?
you ever draw a four of a kind? that's 1 in 4164
48% of Democrat voters in that Rasmussen poll would put your son in jail for refusing to take that chance. Because we all need to get vaccinated over and over no matter what.
https://www.google.com/finance/quote...GxAe&window=5Y
|
The thing that irks me is that as a medical professional, even if you got the ratio of side effects wrong, let’s say you said the rate of myocarditis is 1 in 60,000, you could still have your medical license threatened and be possibly be de-platformed from social media for creating vaccine hesitancy
That means people do not really have informed consent, if the very real concern for misinformation has made any discussion of side effects impossible