Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It really looks like you have the laughable argument.
1. The conversations isn't that twitter should be forced to host conservatives. The discussion is on free speech. And twitter can ban you for your tweets if they deemed extreme or dangerous misinformation. Something conservative just happen to be guilty on the platform of.
2. Twitter and Facebook are havens for the conservatives.
3. Twitter the private business has guidelines and if you break them you are banned. It is as simple as that.
Your analogy is was just flawed.
|
No, no, wrong. Read my above reply to jib. I didn't say they can't ban anyone, but sec 230 requires them to apply their editing in good faith and in an unbiased way, which they demonstrably do not.
What is considered "extreme" is just determined by some activist. They consider a benign tweet about election irregularities to be "extremism", BOOM that guy is banned!
Meanwhile antifa and blm literally organized dozens and dozens or riots using these platforms, and the vast majority of accounts have not been banned. This is clearly not a fair, good faith and unbiased application of their policies. It is clearly curated, which makes them a publisher. This is the *entire* issue.
It always just comes down to slimeball lawyerese whenever the left tries to pretend these companies don't stifle conservatives. Oh look guys, they THRIVE on facebook and twitter! Lol what? Why? Because they haven't *all* been banned?