View Single Post
  #61  
Old 11-21-2021, 08:35 PM
Vivitron Vivitron is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're making so many false assumptions.

First off, when Green 2.0 rolls around, I plan to main an Enchanter. Any "nerfs" to the class will have already been added by the time I play it, so if I'm advocating to "nerf anyone" ... it's myself.

Why would I want to play a nerfed class? Well, why do I want to do anything on this re-creation of a game from '99? Because it's fun, and because I didn't get a chance to back in '99. But I want that experience I missed out in '99, I don't want to play some other fake game where Enchanters have unfair powers: that'd be like playing with cheat modes on.

But beyond all of that, you are woefully mistaken if you think I have any power or influence over Nilbog. That man respects evidence, plain and simple, and if he's making changes, it's because someone presented him with evidence. Someone like ... Dolalin.

Which brings me to my final point: if you want blame anyone, blame Dolalin. Blame him for doing what Nilbog asked for (ie. what posters like you and myself are too lazy to do): he presented evidence that proved Enchanters here were unclassic.

Or you could thank him, for taking the kid gloves off for you, and letting you play actual EverQuest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They're not going off Dolalin's research on this; they're going off Torven's*.

* The research: http://www.eqemulator.org/forums/sho...d.php?p=266999
** The statement that they're planning to use it: https://www.takproject.net/forums/in...62/#post-99583