Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As I pointed out a few posts ago, the information which is described as "excellent work", contains a statement from the poster acknowledging that said information is at best "lacking" due to a small sample size.
You conveniently ignored this, of course.
I understand disinformation and acting stupid are parts of your forum persona, so if I need to requote that a few times more lmk.
|
I ignored nothing (and also refrained from personal insults, something you don't seem to have the basic decency for).
I responded by pointing out that classic evidence doesn't come in nice/neat/tidy packages where someone from 1999 spells out exactly how everything worked with no controversy: virtually
ALL classic evidence is some crappy two-sentence hint in the comments section of Allakhazam from 2002.
Unfortunately, that's just the reality of trying to piece together a 20+ year old game with zero original source code, from a time before the Internet was fully archived! But A) if that's all you have, you have to make the best of it, and B) Nilbog has lots more evidence that we can't see, so presumably that post wasn't the entire basis for the decision: it was just one more "break the camel's back" straw.
Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
@loramin perhaps you and your buddies can elaborate on how the available data can be extrapolated into a model that covers caster level ranges 20-60, vs mob level ranges 20-60.
|
Maybe instead of coming at this with the mentality of child who's had their toy taken away, you could have a little respect for the project you have so much passion over?