[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How about completely irrelevant because the judge did not immediately grant the mistrial after you and the defense said ‘no fair.’ The clear video evidence of provocation was already given to the jury in closing argument. Sorry this very simple statement perplexes you.

Oh and now it looks like FoxNews is reporting:

Judge Schroeder today granted the 36 page explanation of the law to the jury to take home, instructions, which describe the relevant legal points…

…Defense attorney Mark Richards appeared hesitant about the request…

…Jurors must consider "whether the defendant had the opportunity to retreat with safety" and "whether the defendant provoked the attack."

Jurors are more closely looking at what I said, whether Kyle provoked. Good.

lol dude

you're hopeless