Quote:
Originally Posted by Elizondo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
it's not like bot can argue it's the same file, mb size or quality. it's not the same evidence. that's the point. a defendant, by law, is supposed to have access to all the exact same evidence the prosecution has. this is taught in like 1st grade.
bot just emotionally postin about stuff he doesn't understand
|
Wow you still don’t get it, Elizondo. Oh and Homestead …You can’t provoke an unarmed man with a gun who is charging you. Shoot him 4 times, killing him. All while the shooter is not protecting property and by law not supposed to be there.
Stand your ground rules don’t even allow that!!
As for Elizondo I don’t know how much more simple I can make it for you to finally understand?
The closing argument was *** with *** the clearer video to the jury. The defense said literally “not fair” and “we would have changed our whole defense.” The clearer video spoon feeds the fact Kyle did in fact cause provocation by aiming the gun at the unarmed victim TO THE JURY (in closing). This points to murder.
The defense asked for a mistrial and the Judge realizing (perhaps feeling he should stop all his idiocy during the trail ; finally seeing the media) didn’t immediately grant it.
Now regardless of ‘your feelings’ and ‘emotions’ of ‘fairness’ the truth of the matter has been emphasized outside the court (and don’t discredit the power of the people to do ‘right’ regardless of so called crying from the defense or ‘**you**’ saying Waaaaah not fair he should get way with his now clearly murder act).
And hey the jury did see the clearer video in fact multiple times due to their request. I wonder if they match your pure blood ignorant wit and still vote not guilty. Elizondo why don’t you make a pizza joke to calm your nerves LOL.