Quote:
Originally Posted by starkind
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have a problem with the government and it is often immune and shielded from the results of its own mismanagement.
Cops would have it better as individuals under the stated system because they would have better scope. Citizens would be more self reliant and cops would likely be better trained and used less when two neighbors were just being dumb.
Cities and neighborhoods would have to solve their slum problems not just offload it to cops through more hours, extra work load.
I'm talking about holding the city responsible. Not the cops. Cities that can't function should fail and be replaced by those that can solve these problems.
Citizens do not have a "right to a corrupt city " like LA that grinds its cops and citizens to dust for profits for a few elites.
|
Not just immune and shielded from the results of its own mismanagement, but actively incentivised.
Hard to be a good cop when funding is issued for being bad.
@Ooloo: while not a US city cop, I have some experience in enforcement as an operative for the inland waterways authority so I have got my feet wet, in a sense, with ornery boaters and river pirates
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] . Didn't shoot any dogs and never did have any luck catching those swans though.