"The hand recount was not substantially different than the numbers reported shortly after the election" is the headline. Yes, that's true.
That's not the question though, the question is how many of those ballots should have been ineligible to be counted in the first place? The audit also concluded that "there were numerous findings of problems with the election and evidence indicating that tens of thousands of ballots were either illegally cast, or illegally counted". That is the point of the audit. And nobody is saying all of those ballots were for biden, some of them may have been fraudulent trump ballots for all we know. The point is that the election process was completely botched, vulnerable to tampering and interference. Which is something *democrats* like Elizabeth Warren were warning about in 2016. So please spare me the "most secure election in history" line, it's complete horse shit *just* based on arizona.
Not saying trump should have won, absolutely not saying that. But claiming it was "the most secure ever" is just like, childlike naivete.
|