Quote:
Originally Posted by Ektar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've got nothing against gay anything and everything, but to force gay history means throwing out something more important to the grand scheme of history. It's not like current history curricula purposely leave out gay contributions. If a gay person contributes something to history, he goes in; if a straight person contributes something to history, he goes in.
idk to what extent this whole thread is trolling or whatever the fuck you people like to do, but this also recently came up elsewhere in my life recently about forcing women studies into the curriculum and it's the same exact thing.
|
This is a bullshit argument. History, by definition, is always expanding as time passes. As we go from decade to decade, should we ignore the most recent events in history, because if we taught them, we would have to throw out something more important?
You sound like that racist dad from American History X. I'm pretty sure anything they decide to teach will be of historical significance.