Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It’s easy to spot “independent” fact checkers complete partisanship if you just read enough of them. The one that solidified it for me was a “fact check” about the statement that one of the people shot by Kyle Rittenhouse was a sex offender
The fact check (I forget if it was politico or snopes, one of those), basically took multiple paragraphs to say “well yes, he was convicted of a past crime of sexual assault of a minor” in a really roundabout way and then a full paragraph talking about past good deeds the person had done and then another paragraph saying that he didn’t deserve to die for being a sex offender
That was complete obvious bias. 1.) the statement was never about his past good deeds, no one gives a shit. It was whether or not he was a convicted sex offender and 2.) the statement was never about whether he deserved to die for being a sex offender, only whether he was one or not
The bias for the dead liberal was so fucking obvious in the fact check I wouldn’t be surprised if the staff that wrote it would have offered him a handjob if he were still alive to try to see if they could swing his sexual interests away from children
|
Rittenhouse stans are human garbage.