Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So no one has any evidence of where those 74k mail ins came from or who filled them out?
OK, I'll check back
Remember, its what you can prove
Edit: https://t.me/praying_medic/3203 |
"Earlier today Foxnews and a number of other heavily conservative news networks ran a pre-planned fallacy to prop-up readied claims for similar states like Wisconsin to request partisan third party voting audits in a perpetuating money scheme to continue fleecing money from Donald Trump supporters. Powering their narrative that the 2020 election was fraudulent.
The claim, for instance, that 'we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent' to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that 'hundreds of thousands of votes' were in dispute.
Claims continued that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. It was expressed a logical explanation couldn't be found for this suspicion.
Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation, the voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.
You know who doesn't show up on Maricopa's ev32 (sent file) but will show up on the ev33 (early receive file)?
In person early voters not on the Permanent Early Voter List.
https://twitter.com/Garrett_Archer/s...87039866310657
Cyber Ninja's are using a fallacy (Lying with Statistics) to trump supporters to get their support they need for the next scam."
Lying with Statistics: The contemporary fallacy of misusing true figures and numbers to “prove” unrelated claims. (e.g. "In real terms, attending college has never been cheaper than it is now. When expressed as a percentage of the national debt, the cost of getting a college education is actually far less today than it was back in 1965!"). A corrupted argument from logos, often preying on the public's perceived or actual mathematical ignorance. This includes the Tiny Percentage Fallacy, that an amount or action that is quite significant in and of itself somehow becomes insignificant simply because it's a tiny percentage of something much larger. E.g., the arbitrary arrest, detention or interception of "only" a few hundred legally-boarded international travelers as a tiny percentage of the tens of thousands who normally arrive. Under this same fallacy a consumer who would choke on spending an extra dollar for two cans of peas will typically ignore $50 extra on the price of a car or $1000 extra on the price of a house simply because these differences are "only" a tiny percentage of the much larger amount being spent. Historically, sales taxes or value-added taxes (VAT) have successfully gained public acceptance and remain "under the radar" because of this latter fallacy, even though amounting to hundreds or thousands of dollars a year in extra tax burden. See also Half-truth, the Snow Job, and the Red Herring.