Quote:
Originally Posted by myrddraal
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Vanquish provided zero evidence to support the need for a concession in the moment and went radio silent when asked for it
|
If you are upset that Vulak should not have been conceded, then please take it up with your leadership. The concession didn't come until Vulak was at less than 5% on a Vanquish engage, though, so the concession seems superficial at best, anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by myrddraal
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
where Kittens and Riot provided plenty.
|
Exactly zero evidence was provided until 4 days after the event. The first half dozen or so videos showed ambiguous fault and assist on Riot members.
Quote:
Originally Posted by myrddraal
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Vanquish also engaged less than 10 minutes after where there was a near full wipe on klazdaxthum’s train. Apples and oranges but nice spin.
|
The two scenarios probably look very similar to anybody without a biased point of view. KRIOT accuses Vanquish of training them on Vanquish engage. Vanquish accuses KRIOT of training them on KRIOT engage. The differences were in the skill level of handling the train and the recovery. Vanquish members immediately camped when told to do so. KRIOT members are audibly told to camp in their videos and did not. KRIOT had a chance after their train to engage and failed. The biggest difference is that Vanquish did not fail on their attempt after the KRIOT train.