Quote:
Originally Posted by HalflingSpergand
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Drop new york city and an infrastructure to support it anywhere and it will be fine.
Regardless the is plenty of land. A population does not need to be on a river. That's just not relevant at all
|
I mean, it's not necessary, sure. But river access means easier transport of goods, which can impact the health of businesses located there.
Edit: To clarify, I realize that my post isn't directly addressing the actual ability to live in a place. But I am more pointing to that as a factor in why we don't see more of civilization located in these types of areas.