Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, nothing at all clear about the argument that neither of you have been able to answer for more than a page now ...
But by all means, please keep bringing up unrelated tangential arguments, which show you have nothing to say to the thing I keep repeating over and over. It really shows the strength of your oh-so-democratic position.
|
Hilarious Projection
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
whether you like it or not A) IDs do (in practice/effectively) nothing to ensure fair elections, B) they absolutely disenfranchise black voters disproportionately, C) they are part of a VERY LONG history of racist voting laws in Georgia.
Look, if you want to sway me with a logical argument, just provide evidence the above is false. Show me any neutral third-party party that says "yes we legitimately need voter IDs to protect our elections". Or show me any neutral party with evidence that blacks do have IDs at similar rates as whites. Or show me a credible historian who won't tell me Georgia's history is chock full of racist voter suppression laws.
|
If IDs didn't ensure fair elections why the push back against them with such extreme rhetoric
How can anyone possibly sway you with logic? You're purely emotional and lazy. You actually believe if you just call something racist that settles it
You're being very patronizing and racist towards blacks by assuming they don't want election integrity. Going by your logic, when a black person attempts to buy a beer and has to show ID he's being "disenfranchised".
I have a challenge for you that I'm 100% sure you will fail
Make your case against showing proof of voting eligibility without conjuring up racism and Jim Crow. You won't even try. I'm sure of it.