Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You can make an argument for why you think you and I should be banned from government but that same exact argument can apply to antifa occupy Wall Street Bernie Sanders AOC or the Squad support.
Just because I read a website just because I comment on project 1999 doesn’t mean that I am a terrorist and I shouldn’t be involved in normal activities.
If the normal vetting process would’ve solve this problem in the first place then why do they need to introduce this bill?
Seems to me like they’ve added being affiliated with or being open minded or interacting with certain political groups, now disqualifies you from having the rights afforded to you by the bill of rights.
I doubt this bill is going to pass because to me I sounds like it’s crazy.
|
They don't. They are crazy. It's idiotic. Reread my post.
I agree.
But its not banning ppl from government. A lot of people serve in government without clearances. Mayors, county commissioners. Sherrifs. (Maybe confidential but)...
I believe we are over reliant on the clearance system and there's other things we should be doing, were screwing otherwise good combat medics cuz of confidential stuffs, but this is a different topic, tangent.
Qanons shouldn't be granted clearances tho. Also a difference between reading and staying abreast of and intelligence gathering, and outright espousing qanon.
If it passes ill be mind blown and depressed. Momentarily, its a checkbox against those for it.