Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nobody here has claimed that you cannot prefer Trolls over other races. Your preference is not a fact that proves Trolls are objectively better, however. Please just say it is you opinion, instead of looking like you want a discussion, or have your questions answered. That is wasting peoples time, because they take their time to respond to you, but you don't actually want a response. Your point that "this is just a game" was not clearly stated anywhere until this last post.
That philosophy of spending time is silly. People play games to relax, which is not a waste of time at all. Human beings are not machines, and cannot be productive for every waking second. Nor should they be.
Nobody said Everquest was a way of life, or a religion. The simple truth is all video games are based on concrete rules and maths. There is an objective best race/class combination for each class. Knowledge is power, and it is good to know what the best is, and by how much. This is because Everquest is the type of game where most people only make one character per class. It takes too much time, money, and effort to make multiple levels 60s for specific purposes. There is no religious fervor here when I say Ogres are objectively the best. I am simply analyzing the facts and coming to a conclusion. I would be happy to be proven wrong if you can bring something to the table [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
These racial debates exist because there really is not an objective best race/class combination for every single class, especially shaman. There are a lot of grey areas, highly based on which situation you're in. Until you can prove that in every possible scenario an Ogre is superior, which clearly in your guide that's not the case, this debate will continue to go on. Unlike an iksar monk, or barbarian rogue, the shaman race debate will never end because of how diverse the racial advantages are.