Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwaihir
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Check it out kid
https://www.nature.com/news/2004/040...040913-24.html
So, if we can experimentally prove that increasing density accelerates radioactive decay
And
We know the universe was originally more dense
Because
As time goes on the universe increasingly expands, verified by background radiation observed with modern instrumentation.
Then we can assert that radioactive used to occur at a quicker rate when the density of time-space was higher.
Thanks for playing
The "age of the planet" is largely attested to potassium-argon decay rates as well as some nickel cobalt observations. Scientists "assume" a consistent decay rate. That is not provable, it's an assumption currently accepted, but it is...an assumption. Under current definitions of "faith" (blind belief), its faith that makes that assumption. |
I said YOUR paper. Wow if you put a few atoms IN THE CENTER OF A STAR you can speed of their decay by half a day.. 12 hours.... LOL You said every single scientist was wrong and every single date, any dating, its all wrong. Based on, if you put it all in the middle of a star.
At what time in the universe was the entire thing as dense as the inside of a star, and for how long?? Lets hear it. You said you know. So lets keep going, son.
How long was the universe in a state where it was the same conditions as the inside of a star? I'd like it to the year, please. You did say you knew more. So, tell us more, son.
Dont get upset and run away. Oh and tell me, how long has it been since the universe resembled the conditions of the inside of a star?? Few billion?? 10 billion? 12 billion?? How long, exactly. Since you know more than all the scientists on earth, lets hear it. I'd like to see YOUR research.