Quote:
Originally Posted by imperiouskitten
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I can give you a list of things I'd have done differently, for instance mandating the covering of produce at the supermarket and funding upgrades of air purification systems (since allegedly the air purification on airplanes makes them pretty darn safe). And that's not hindsight; I've been screaming at my TV all frickin year.
Under Hillary we would probably have had an early mask mandate, which would have improved things quite a bit. But I do think that's the only thing that would be different, and we would have closed travel to China much later too. And, we'd also be on the ground in Syria so I dunno.
|
So, you would have done things which would result in feel-good-politics but in the real world have only the most minimal effect on virus transmission? This 99.7% survival rate virus?
100 years from now, we will know how we could have mitigated it better. Nobody has any ideas that are better than others, because nobody knows what they are doing, Not WHO not CDC not Fauci not Birx not Adhanom not trump not biden not big bird not you not me.
In 2020, 2021 and 2022 at the very least, the debate will continue to rage. At this early stage, nothing can be proved, and if you cannot prove it, You are Debating Philosophy, not hard science.