Quote:
Originally Posted by MaCtastic
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is cute. Sorry not sorry that we petitioned when there was a serious offense that occurred against us. If there were real accountability, instead of dismissive half hearted attempts to pander our complaints, while concurrently rushing for pixels, it would have been different. But that one event was enough to break the ‘camels back’.
Also, just because we could gather facts, structure them in a logical structure, to clearly articulate a sequence of event, demonstrates seriousness. All of which is required in the current climate manufactured by the ‘toxic few’. Sorry not sorry you were found guilty of exploiting others in order to benefit instead of taking responsibility for your actions.
|
You might be the cutest! So let's get the cards on the table for this one...
A member of AG accidentally trained wToV without consent of leadership, who also went against the suggestions of said leadership and it somehow is the fault of an entire guild by association? Let's look at what was offered pulling in the direct text from the petition response:
- AG offered to recover Kittens; it was declined.
- AG conceded LTK; it was declined.
- AG invited Kittens to Tunare; it was declined.
- Freedom invited Kittens to Tunare; it was declined.
- AG offered another LTK concession for a total of 2 LTK concessions now; it was declined.
- Freedom and AG conceded the next LTK, Telk, Gozz; It was declined.
Accidents happen based on poor decision making but let's not say there was no accountability, that would be inaccurate. As I read the petitions I didn't get a sense of KWSM making specific arguments at the time of infraction on how clear things up.
Could this have been handled differently, for sure but let's not take things to the extreme here.