View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-13-2020, 12:52 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It’s an obvious move to pack the courts with legislate from the bench liberal judges. The Right does not legislate from the bench the same way the left does. The left sees the SCOTUS, as another branch to legislate from. The right sees it as a way to protect the tenants of the constitution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBellamy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The Republicans are trying to appoint judges that respect the sanctity of human life and also very importantly follow the intent and the words of the Constitution, whereas the Democrats like to appoint judges that allow people to murder other human beings in the name of 'privacy' [the constitutional right to privacy]
Like this post 100% contradicts your post FS, but you said, that BB "gets it"

This is why I dont get it.

Again, im pro life, just pro constitution as well, and in this instance the democrats are the ones protecting it. The conversation isnt about your moral stance on abortion, its about if you think the scotus should legislate or not.

This proves that you need democrats and republicans to fight for the constitution, it proves that we need a balanced number of judges, not a court packed with one ideology that thinks it's protecting the sanctity of life.

If one political party, packs the court with their ideology, we need balance, we need the other side. Otherwise, legislating is exactly what you're trying to do.
Last edited by Jibartik; 10-13-2020 at 01:09 PM..