Quote:
Originally Posted by fadetree
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That. And how would it work, anyway? So if I 'visit' manastone camp occasionally and build up to 40 hours, say, and that's the highest for people who are trying to get it. However, I'm not at the camp when the next stone drops, what happens? Do I somehow get the stone? If you say well, you have to actually be holding the camp to get your stone, then we're right back to where we were: either standard /list or lots of camp stealing. And, how would time accrue? Do I have to be actively holding down the camp to get hours? Can I just sort of be nearby? If so, how far? You probably mean that you would accrue it for just sitting at the list, but the same kind of problem exists - it puts people in the position of getting a stone they didn't kill for and screwing the guy who actually did kill for it because you had more 'list time'. In fact, you could do nothing but sit in list and get the stone eventually, no actual fight required. It's really kind of an unworkable idea.
There is no way to fix this by tweaking the ruleset. It is literally impossible. Making the all of the items LORE NODROP would sort of work to cut down on the /list account sharing problems, but at the expense of really murdering the classic utility of the item. At that point, we should just remove the items altogether and be done with it.
|
No, if you’re not at the camp you don’t get the stone. If you revisit the camp your hours would be saved for when you re-list. Time would accrue as long as you’re on /list and following the already set rules for being on list. The issue of not having to kill a single PH ALREADY exists. Some players just lay in FD snd have their girlfriends click the AFK-boxes.
Making it based on hours camped total over any number of sessions would make the farm more available and at the same time make it less attractive to the super-neckbeards eho could get better pp/hr elsewhere if they have to farm 240hrs for a manastone.