Quote:
Originally Posted by Mblake81
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
All I can say is the usual yabba dabba doo. Did you just want to be seen and heard?
|
Why does anyone post on a twenty-plus year old elf sim forum?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mblake81
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There is a sense of loss here, would it be preferable if they were still focused on classic on and exploits or what is perceived as exploits?
You say you don't see it as good or bad, not sure if I buy that.
|
The staff has always been about classic EverQuest: that hasn't changed, so there is nothing to mourn. The only thing that has changed is that their
specific path to achieving classic EQ: that path has
always involved a mix of classic and unclassic mechanics ... but now it veers
slightly further away from classic mechanics.
So to answer your question, no: it truly does not bother me that the staff is working hard to re-create classic EQ here. Why should I care that this place went from 98% classic mechanics to 97.5% ... when it feels more classic overall, and it was never 100% in the first place?
Does that mean I
<3 every exploit fix? Of course not: as I said, the SG glitch nerf has felt wrong to me ever since Velious was released, and I suspect it will always feel wrong. If we're going to let people bind in TD, I personally feel there should be a period of time where you can glitch through SG on Green.
But would I rather have a server where the straff prioritizes classic mechanics over everything else? God no! That's how we got single bards monopolizing Overthere, and AoE groups monopolizing Chardok, two things that no one alive remembers on live servers in 1999-2001 ... because it never happened.
I want the game from '99-'01 ... don't you?