Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazek
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Your comment is beyond stupid and all you're demonstrating is that you can't think logically and have zero end game experience.
One example is the fact that the level of the stun is irrelevant to its usefulness based on what it does.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazek
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Except clerics don't do any of those things in raids because they have to med and use mana for heals, buffs and rezzes. No cleric stands there chain stunning mobs and picking up adds.
All of the things I listed are significant and what makes paladins useful that I did during every raid personally.
I'm not saying pallies are better than clerics or vice versa. But to say pallies are the worst class, or even close, is a flat out lie. All of the paladins utility is a compliment to their tanking ability and damage.
And compared to a warrior; warriors get a slight bonus in HP and AC except none of the utility and even less damage from having to use 1h's with procs. Warriors would be better off letting a pally or SK tank and using a 2h for damage during trash. Because even if you gave them time for agro, thats even less efficient than just letting a hybrid snap it and DPS immediately.
And there's so much more to say, but you have to think for yourself instead of me trying to explain all of it. Even though i've provided plenty of reasons for why a well played paladin is highly effective.
|
Warriors will and have always out damaged paladin-SK's. And your stun "fact" fails to mention the resist check modifier since your casting a lvl 34 spell at 50.
Like I said, paladin players are fucking delusional about the class.