Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why is everyone acting like that screenshot is so damning, anyway? Like my bff Rejuvenation I believe that (judging from the screenshot) the correct decision was made. So far no one has given a reason why the decision was incorrect, instead they've just posted that screenshot as if it alone constitutes proof.
|
From what I understand, the problem was that one gm/guide came in and took an item from a player and gave it to another player without first hearing arguments from both sides or doing the petition research to make an informed decision.
More than four hours earlier, to solve a dispute involving Twizzt and Bearnuts about who was ahead in line. Amelinda was "hands off" and told the players to resolve the dispute. Instead of a compromise or making an agreement, bearnuts KS'd the mob in question and gave the prod to a necro buddy and then remained there stating he was first in line. This caused Twizzt to immediately petition the KS but there was no answer to the petition at all - four hours later another chancellor pops. Twizzt attacks this mob because he beleives its his rightful mob since bearnuts KS'd him on the last mob that was rightfully his. Twizzt gets the kill with no contest because Bearnuts went LD for that moment. Twizzt takes prod and leaves. Bearnuts comes back from LD and has Uthgaard there immediately. Then you see how things were resolved by the screenshots. Essentially Bearnuts got two prods in a row, which is why this seems to have been handled poorly.
Again, this is just from what information I was able to gather.