Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
IF you get to define "which is/was more classic?" only as "which resulted in closer to classic population numbers?", then that is an objective fact, and we can both agree that the post-merge numbers are "more classic" in that sense.
But I would also suggest that the question "which is/was more classic?" could be interpreted many other ways than just considering population numbers. I have absolutely zero desire to in engage in any kind of argument one way or the other, I'm just saying what I said was far broader in scope than what you said ... and what I said is not incontrovertibly clear one way or the other: both sides have arguments to make.
|
You creating this thread is just stringing the drama our further. Stop shit disturbing.