Quote:
Originally Posted by KelticKope
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Everyone Needs upgrades, money buys upgrades. Everyone put in effort to kill the mob with the riches, everyone deserves equal chance at the rewards.
If people want to be generous and pass, that is their individual discretion. Its what we ALWAYS do among friends and guildies.
But saying everyone rolls, and everyone gets an equal chance, is greedy?
An equal chance is greedy? Sorry no.
That is what YOU are saying. That is illogical. NBG is appropriate among friends or guildies. Or for No Drop Items.
|
This should be the norm. It gets even more confusing when people say NBG in a non-guild/friend group because then you should be making the decision, well which of you ACTUALLY needs the item more (and not which can actually USE the item).
Scenario: If a group insists on NBG and we have a Warrior, Ranger, and Rogue in the group. A SSOY drops. All can potentially use the item, but I would argue that the Warrior should get first dibs if they insist on a nonsensical NBG rule. Ykesha proc generates a decent amount of aggro, and as such, that’s aggro I’d rather have the Warrior generating then the other two classes. (A rough example, but you see my point).
So at what point do we progress from NBG to then ACTUAL need above others? Or let’s say one of them already has an SSOY, does that mean it’s less fair for that person to roll on it if the other two don’t have the item? Who makes the decision on this as we venture further and further down the rabbit hole?
NBG, in addition to being unfair to other members in the group who participated, makes the choice of who DOES get to roll on an item much more convoluted.