THINK PEOPLE
You are #1 on list.
At #2-6 spot on the list why would someone help YOU kill the named if refusing to do so will move them move up the list by kicking YOU off?
If this is how it works, the only people that will help you kill are people [b]NOT[/b[ on the list.
Who is going to help someone camp a legacy item for 70 hours who is NOT on the list? For 99% of people, NO ONE. The other 1% are neckbeards who account share. Sorry beckbeards, /list wasn't made for you, it was made because of you.
This proposed solution makes the problem worse.
Don't change list. Adding in silly participation requirements will just bring more CSR issues.
A question I am dying to know:
Do you want the Devs to code or CSR the following issues?
• Do non-PH, non-legacy mobs at camp need to be participated in?
• Can #1, a cleric, heal AFTER each fight when aggro is clear instead of during?
• Can they heal after each round of mobs instead of during?
• How much HP do they have to heal to be considered "participating"?
• What buffs must they supply?
• How many seconds can there be between 1 buff dropping and it being reapplied?
• How often will these "assistance checks" be?
• What will these "assistance checks" be based on? Mezzing, healing, bind wound, buffs, pet damage.....?
• If a druid only casts "Burst of Flame" each fight at the end, is that participation?
LegalQuesters gonna LegalQuest. List sucks, but it's better than other alternatives. Deal with it.
|