Quote:
Originally Posted by feniin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They went for the most basic charges that can't be disproved or disputed. Abuse of Power of Office will include the QPQ demand. Maybe if you would have paid any attention to any of the inquiry and testimony you would have noticed that's what they were aiming for.
Not going to defend the violation of the Emoluments clause? The constitution doesn't seem to matter to you unless it's 2A.
|
Sorry but "The judges were particularly swayed by Mooppan’s assertion that the congressional Democrats did not represent the entire legislative branch, and as individuals
they could not show that they had been harmed by the ongoing nature of the president’s business relationships with foreign countries"
Nope and also care about every amendment. We just have a lot different interpretations of how those are played out. You believe in somehow gaining rights by restricting rights, I don't really believe that to be true.