Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripp
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right.
Perhaps you can explain to all of us what happened to Quid Pro Quo, bribery and all the other false accusations first.
I'm sure Harvard will loan your expertise out to us unlearned peons for a few hours. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
They went for the most basic charges that can't be disproved or disputed. Abuse of Power of Office will include the QPQ demand. Maybe if you would have paid any attention to any of the inquiry and testimony you would have noticed that's what they were aiming for.
Not going to defend the violation of the Emoluments clause? The constitution doesn't seem to matter to you unless it's 2A.