View Single Post
  #6  
Old 12-05-2019, 03:11 PM
BallzDeep BallzDeep is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ligma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Anecdotal? It's a god damn federal ruling? Are you seriously that dense?
Lol you are stupid. It was a NC law. NC law. North Carolina. Yes it is a federal ruling on a law that created for the STATE of NC that could have some language in the law that was discrimination. That does not mean all vote ID laws are discriminatory. This is very very easy. You sir, are the dense one.

It is anecdotal in the aspect that you are using one law that was drafted in NC that could've had some language that was identified as discriminatory to ONE supreme court judge. This is called anecdotal evidence. This does not mean ALL voter ID laws are bad. This does not mean ALL voter ID laws are discriminatory. This does not mean ALL judges would agree with his assessment.
Last edited by BallzDeep; 12-05-2019 at 03:13 PM..