Quote:
Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right. He (and the others) has been 95+% consistently making mechanics classic for over a decade AND says that's what he is trying to do... but we totally should not believe him because of a handful of exceptions that are generally explained by the fact that this is a hobby and handled by volunteers.
Why didn't I think of that?!
|
He (and the others) have been doing things in a nonclassic way for QoL and convenience for over a decade. When he chooses some QoL things over others it seems more like perhaps some people's complaints get them further and that perhaps he isn't as unbiased as the sig suggests.
I'd be willing to believe: "Make it classic except when it makes the game unplayable for some, or exploited by some", which is fine and very much in the spirit of the game (mage fixes on live were made ASAP and only took so long because of the time to discover the problem, so again it is in the spirit of the game to introduce them).
But then they just don't patch mages and makes it seem like "Let me make the QoL changes that people I like benefit from and not bother with others".