Quote:
Originally Posted by SenoraRaton
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This ENTIRE server is silly. I didn't write the rules, or make the system I just work within the confines I have been given. I don't have Fraps to show you that I'm a competent bard with these confines, but I guarantee you that many other people are playing bards without your "scripts" that are even more competent than me.
Its pretty clear that you expect something different from this server than I do. I expect a classic EQ experience, and the Devs seek to provide that. You have a perception of "perfect bard play" that you want to recreate. I honestly don't agree with your implementation whether its legal or not, because it forces players to utilize outside influences to enhance game play, which is not classic.
|
"I don't need logical fixes for obvious game flaws because I can twist two songs and equip my lute during downtime and that's classic! I mean 5 songs while managing a pet, instruments, mezzes, group macros, movement, and meleeing. But I can't prove it because i've never heard of OBS." yeahokay.
I strongly advocate "keeping things classic" but that can be taken too far just like making changes. And that's why fixing things with good judgement is best instead of either of those extremes. But they're just too afraid of offending the overzealous classic cult and the slippery slope that usually results from the inability to see the limits.
And in this case, allowing a standard UI with extra action slots or single tapping songs by any means is a reasonable and beneficial fix with zero negative impact on the "classic experience."