Quote:
Originally Posted by Not_Mikeo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bazia is Loramin's burner account for those that didn't know.
|
LOL, I'm a forum addict, I'll admit that much, but if you think I'm as ... "engaged" as Lulz, and have time to create extra forum accounts ... you must not have been paying attention to how much time I waste on the wiki
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But really this whole conversation is so frustrating to me. You have two sides absolutely refusing to honestly communicate. On the anti-Enchanter side, lots of people are ignoring how important classic-ness, and classic evidence is. This place is
not about "feels", it's about 1999.
On the other side ... yes, Enchanter lovers, I get it: your class is powerful, and you like that. Also, lots of classic evidence suggests that it should be powerful. Just because a bunch of haters don't like that the most powerful class is powerful, is
absolutely, 100%, not a reason to change that class.
BUT ... again, this is a place for classic EverQuest. And EVERYONE who played on live, including all you passionate Enchanter defenders (whether you played an Enchanter there or not) ... you all
know Enchanters weren't like this on live.
Sure people were ignorant back then, but that doesn't explain the game being completely different. A class that wasn't even a DPS class in classic is the best DPS class here.
Whatever your passions, whatever your tribe, if you truly respect the mission of classic EverQuest, you HAVE to admit ... there's something hollow about claiming you can wave away the huge unclassic nature of all this with "people were dumb back then".