Quote:
Originally Posted by Ligma
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You've done a really good job of posting out of era stuff that doesn't even support your assertion
|
Its a mechanic that existed throughout. Its meant to show that it has never changed. and 1999 2001 posts are in era. No patch notes say removed how agility effects movement.
It doesn't have to be exact on this date it was like this, because this is hard information to find. You have done a real good job at being a troll about it. If you use common sense instead of saying well this wasn't at this time, so this means for certain it was changed.... in 2002 it changed no question. Evidence, common sense, patch notes.
Read the posts. Read the dates .. when i post out of dates i say in there its only to show its not changed. Do i need to show entire patch notes to prove that it hasn't changed to be qualifying argument for you?
Last i checked it was called P1999 which there is evidence of this in there of the time of 1999.
I ask for common sense. Dear lord just common sense. Not just nope date wrong cant be no way that never happened.. its all out of era so that is 100% proof it did not work like this..
And really this post isn't meant for you. Bring evidence showing its wrong please and thank you. Patch note anything show how this is not how it worked. That AGI has no effect on movement speed. I will gladly admit defeat...
So again let me explain so you understand.. The out of era posts are meant as i stated before to only show this is a mechanic that has existed throughout... there is still evident proof in other posts that show for IN ERA as well. I showed for both before and after era ONLY to bring more evidence to the existing point i am trying to make about AGI's effect on movement speed. How encumbrance declines AGI which in turn declines movement speed... NOT encumbrance it self declining movement speed. The two go hand n hand so a lot will believe it in the reverse. So finding evidence to prove it is the opposite is quite hard to do, but i have done it.
No they don't have to change it either way i will be fine with it.. My point is solely for purposes of it being the same as it was back then. If it is placed back in the way it was, that does change a few things. It makes AGI a more important stat, which it was. It makes spells like cripple on a warrior or any other player for that matter much much more dangerous .. in which it was.
The NPC effect factor, which i was mostly trying to prove, i cannot prove.. I found almost nothing accept other people stating it worked the way i remember it. This i know is not evident enough.
Thanks and have a nice day. Since you assuming i must be wrong automatically because its out of era.