Seemed like they had a good thing going to seamlessly merge to blue with green/blue shared name pool. No one was really complaining (rare!)
Wonder if they shelved merge-to-blue plans, or if its a mess-up.. or just a "heck it" moment from the staff...
or maybe they chose to open names on green/teal strategically late to minimize renames, while opening up freedom for the server? Seems weird though since we have like 3 years yet to create a big renaming headache for staff if so.
Teal/Green is sharing fine, though
|