Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'll use an argument the selectively classic clique have used on myself and others when presenting forum posts as evidence. It's hearsay. You have no proof that the poster didn't have an agenda/that they are telling the truth. You have no documented proof that that test actually was conducted and that the poster isn't just lying about it. Etc. etc. etc. These have been the types of arguments used against old forum posts when it doesn't fit the "I want classic, but anything that was classic that made things easier needs to be removed" agenda. So I think I'll just use them here now since they seem to work with respect to changes the selectively classic squad wants.
|
Are you retarded?
E: I can't actually believe what I'm seeing in this thread. We should dismiss this in-era forum post because the poster might have had an agenda, even though all the other posts we have agree with it? I don't have words to describe how stupid and dishonest that is