Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexenu
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If GINA was not extremely powerful then it would be rarely used and no one would care if it was banned.
|
I like having the freedom to decide if I want to use gina or not. The problem with calling for things to be banned is when does it stop and who gets to decide what's worth a ban.
There is a bigger picture and it's not a 1 issue topic. You want gina banned. But do you want forced fullscreen? When will it end. Just let the people have freedom.
Remember this when they ban something you like, you stood up and asked for something someone else likes to be banned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mblake81
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sure, i see it as more of the steroid debate. Do you allow something that can possibly give an edge to some? if so should others opt to use it or not. You could argue it is performance-enchancing (that's the point) and some people are not able to hit home runs without aid.
|
Steroids should be mandatory in professional sport.