Loramin, calling someone ignorant isn't doing you any justice. You are making my point for me. I listed absolute unclassic things that are currently in game. You ADMIT to the changes, then go about stating "the reasons" why the changes were made. Bottom line: You confirmed what I have been saying all along.
You keep calling me ignorant, trying to invalidate my claims. Yet I can produce verifiable evidence and documentation on my claims.
I'm guessing we may be having a touch of the Dunning-Kruger effect happening here.
My only claim was that they already changed stuff from classic already. You claimed it's classic, but they changed ABC because of XYZ. But the core argument remains....
It's been changed from classic, for whatever reason.
"But they had to change stuff because they didn't have paid GMs!"....and that has what to do with anything? That just states the reason they CHANGED it to begin with, but in the end it was indeed changed.
(I cannot believe you ever played the original game if you never heard of, or encountered, the infamous Erudin's Crossing deck-shark....REALLY???)
__________________
"An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist, half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it needs to be."
"The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past, and every sinner has a future."
--Oscar Wilde
|