Quote:
Originally Posted by Tethler
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Interesting take there. If an MP represents an area that overwhelmingly voted remain, that MP should then do everything in their power to assist with Brexit? That sounds like a betrayal against the people that they represent to me.
|
Nope. That's simply taking a loss you earned by not having enough people show up to vote. Like I pointed out, getting 48% of the vote doesn't award concessions. Yes MP's have duty to their people but correct me if I'm wrong because I don't know UK government structure super well but here in the US, we have a greater duty to the central government first and foremost and thus the overall body of people before the specific states, I assume it's the same over there. You're not allowed to trip over federal guidelines to cater to your specific state. You work your state rights within the federal not the other way. Otherwise things will get fucked up pretty fast if little states have these many rights. Causing a ruckus that mucks up the procedure of the win vote is treasonous against the rest of your country by pushing to break down the social compact. Of course there's outside foreign entities that are pushing this very break down of social compact because why the fuck not? It's largely going to be elite foreigners taking advantage of no brexit and why should they care about UK's sovereignty and the integrity of that government? It's not theirs, it's simply there for them to make profit off of. There's a lot of foreigners in the EU that are big time trade moguls who stand to lose a lot if UK leaves and they don't gain anything if the UK keeps integrity dealing with its common people. It's sad they have so much funds to create so much influence from a vested position that isn't UK citizenship.