Quote:
Originally Posted by NegaStoat
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've said it once, and I'll say it again. Telling players that want to select a shadowknight, paladin, ranger, or bard that they have to eat a 40% experience penalty on top of their racial penalty while trying to enjoy the classic side of grouping for 2/3's of the server's life span is too much to ask for. I'm giving it a pass.
|
Yup - I pointed to the dev letter on this topic in the other thread about the exp modifiers.
The purpose of the penalty was because at launch, hybrids were expected to be more powerful and the penalty was intended to balance it out.
Same for racial penalties -- ogre warriors were designed to be better than other options so they get an exp penalty to make it fair.
The fact that it was a penalty shared across the group was so that when your 5 buddies play together, 4 of you don't constantly out level your troll SK friend. So the penalty is "shared" so everyone levels at the same rate.
All great logic -- but then they admitted it was flawed and removed the class penalties and shared modifiers.
Its not like I'm going to sit here and cry and refuse to play green because of an exp penalty, I don't even want to play those classes or races.
But, I think it is one of these scenarios where the "Its classic" argument is really silly.
Racial modifiers, sure. Hybrids? No. Splitting it across the group? No.