Quote:
Originally Posted by Loadsamoney
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, Greater Healing isn't exactly going to be all that good at 57 so I don't see a Ranger doing any backup healing, but Rangers do at least get Chloroplast as well, so I'll definitely mix that into the rotation to help ease the healers burden, or at least a little more self sufficiency.
I was going to ask that, while they still can't compete with Druids and Shamans, I would think that Paladins still make decent secondary healers just because of the fact that they eventually get the spell Superior Healing?
|
Heh, a paladin at 59 has more efficient healing than a druid or non torpor shaman. Longer recast though, but assuming it doesn’t need to be casted more than every 30 sec it’s better than nature’s touch and superior heal/chloroblast. Pallies dps still sucks, but velious made them fantastic healers for a melee class.