At which point in my post did I try to define "Classic"? I just said the timeline of EQ is very well defined, which it is, this is just a fact. Now if you want to call "a jerk" someone who is merely stating a fact, without even paying attention to what they say, be my guess but expect to loose some credibility in the process.
Well, people are allowed to say whatever they want but this guys has barely ever posted on the forum before and starts by posting something that is pretty much the anti-thesis of what the server as been made for. He has to expect being flamed over and over. I pull my hat off to his thick skin though.
Guess this is the only point where everyone agrees
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You will stop having problems with people when you start listening to them (cf. my first point). I did read what Zuranthium say (even the wall of text he linked) and strongly disagree.
The only point I agree with him is that we can not re-live the immersion we once lived but I fail to see what bringing some heavy change such as making charm a permanent effect has to do with it. Even if it is just charm animal, this is a very heavy change that is game changing. Zuranthium point is that it won't matter at high level (disagree again but hey, let's assume that's right); what about the population who is in no rush to level and stays in their 20-40 for a very ling time? For them, this change alters their experience deeply.
Up to now, with the exception I've just mentionned about the immersion, everything I read from Zuranthium appears to me as an idea he has had and quickly came to post without giving it a second thought to see if it was valid or understand the impact it would have. Coming from someone who barely ever posted before, people will consider him like a troll and treat him as such.