Quote:
Originally Posted by AenorVZ
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"But when it came to the release of the stolen emails, Barr’s phrasing changed. He noted that, under applicable law, publication of the emails would be illegal only if the person publishing them had also participated in stealing them. He then went on to say the investigation did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign “illegally participated in the dissemination” of the stolen emails."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/pb/op...=.369986ada71c
Here's the guy who will be deciding if Barr's interpretation is correct once Assange is extradited:
https://www.npr.org/2019/04/23/71603..._medium=social |
It's not wrong in a moral sense to disseminate the news, and it's certainly never illegal. The Washington Post reported that Trump Jr. was given a link to Wikileaks, and then turned around and shared that link with others. If your definition of collusion would make every Twitter, Facebook, and internet user a criminal you might want to rethink your definition of collusion.