Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillusional
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey Francois, much respect.
|
Love you too buddy. Was just watching one of our old Vulak videos and saw your name pop up. Those were lovely times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillusional
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The Situation:
Guild A has 10 neckbeards
Guild B has 90 neckbeards.
The question:
Why should Guild B settle for an agreement that nets them 50% of the pixels available when they can leverage their numbers?
|
AG & Core have been doing Tunare together recently. Combined our numbers aren't lower than AMs. I don't know how many people PS & friends have on their clears, but I'd imagine it's a large number as well.
So a more accurate representation of our current situation would be...
Guild A: 100 neckbeards
Guild B: 100 neckbeards
Guild C: 100 neckbeards
So if you would like to distribute loot evenly, then a 3 guild (or team-up) system wouldn't be a problem. When one guild believes they deserve more than the others the system starts to fall apart. I understand that AM thinks they deserve more than the other guilds, they have enjoyed that position for many months now.
I personally would like a system that allows smaller guilds to give the zone a shot. To me, PoGrowth is one of the few places left on P99 where you can actually hang out with your entire guild and face PvE content.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillusional
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If a meta is forced upon guild B that doesn't reward zerg, then obviously it has to adapt and get lean.
|
I would love this. I think other guilds might have more fun when content isn't trivialized by throwing numbers at it.
I don't fault AM for growing so big. They keep recruitment open to prevent apps from going to the competition and they don't have to rely so heavily on a small group of people to make plays.