Quote:
Originally Posted by falkun
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In all my years in EQ, I never played a binding class above L20. I still managed to raid and experience tons of content.
But, I'll indulge your "the haves vs. the have nots".
- Its casters that always have to sit and med while melees get to fight a mob from 100% -- 0%.
- Its casters that always have to scavange for armor while the melees get awesome armor sets.
- Its melees that get game-changing clickies like warriors getting shrink, invis, and a healing clicky or rangers with free summoned arrows.
- Its casters that, for the entire life of classic, have inferior DPS to melees.
- Its casters that have to wait for the melees to arrive before they can start doing anything, so they aren't gaining anything by being an ass to the warrior thats running those 3 zones you mention.
This game is NOT balanced in the way WoW is balanced. STOP trying to shoehorn YOUR ideas of balance on this game. If you want the type of balance you are discussing, go back to your newer MMOs. I want this kind of balance, so I'm here. If you want some other kind of balance, look somewhere else.
|
you are confused here - i am NOT trying to change your game- this discussion about design flaws, instabilities and imbalances. If you don't see it that way, you can leave the discussion.
and no, WoW is not balanced neither, if that makes you happy =P