Quote:
Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rangers were most likely holding back on DPS because they wanted your warrior to keep aggro without wasting mana on Jolt. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
No, rangers are just mediocre dps. I parse groups. I parse raids. Rangers are just not that good at dps. Great class, but not stellar dps. DPS for ranger is solidly middle of the road.
Quote:
|
Is it just me or are you comparing your warrior when you want to talk about DPS, but then when you're talking about holding aggro, you switch to comparing your paladin?
|
No. Rangers have snap aggro. Warriors do not. My warrior has plenty of 'non-snap' or 'on demand' aggro over time. Rangers do not threaten my warrior's aggro over time but they do have an initial advantage. Ranger threat vs knight/bard threat is a wash. Any of those classes can have it if they want it and all TANK better than rangers.
This isn't a ranger hate thread. I love the ranger class. They just are not good tanks. They are "good enough".