Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripqozko
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd venture to say most guilds trying are happy, maybe a few rules ironed out. It'd be more legit if you said you wanted rotations for Anon to get mobs intead of "for better of server" which ya wouldn't know about.
|
No one knows what's best for the server off the top of their head, not even Rogean: we all have our own individual isolated vantage points. The entire point of having an open an honest public debate is to share those vantage points, and hopefully have the people with closer-to-accurate opinions share them with others who don't have as much visibility from where they sit.
And again, I'm not arguing as a member of Anonymous, I'm arguing as someone who has played here for half a decade, and before that played on live where I absolutely saw the benefit of content being shared (but again, not top content: even as Bristlebane allowed rotations on Vox and Naggy, Vex Thal was absolutely the domain of only the top guilds on the server). Even if I wasn't in a guild at all, or even if I was in Aftermath, I'd still rather play on a server where 40% have access to raid content rather than 10%.
So make some honest arguments: the current system where X% of the playerbase gets to see certain content and Y% which is capable of killing that content doesn't get to, is the absolute best system for Project 199 because ... go!